The Hurt Locker (2009)
Starring: Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty
Dir.: Kathryn Bigalow
Country: USA
Genre: Suspense, War, Drama
“That Devon Sawa sure turned things around for himself,” I thought after seeing promos for The Unusuals after Lost on ABC, and after seeing the trailer for this film. Yes, well, we can’t all be on all of the time… my apologies Mr. Renner for assuming you were in Final Destination, Idle Hands and the covers of numerous tween pop mags.
I’ve mentioned my hesitancy towards the war-genre before, and time after time I am reminded of why I need to shed that ridiculous fear I have, as I continue to discover these mind-blowing films. But The Hurt Locker doesn’t quite glorify the action of war like a lot of films tend to do. Instead, it steadies its bomb-defusing hand on a very unbiased viewpoint. It doesn’t quite pose the questions of “why” like Jarhead does, and it doesn’t dwell on the “what for” like Saving Private Ryan, but rather just does its duty without questioning. And its duty is to be as suspenseful as any movie can possibly be.
From the beginning scene of the film until quite literally the last second, this film executes some of the greatest on-screen tension I’ve felt since No Country For Old Men. Each scene builds its own arc of suspense, which creates a palpable sense of uneasiness. But this on-edge feeling is never alienating as each scene also contributes to the whole picture developing the story and the characters with each course of action, (which these characters are some of the most in-depth I’ve seen in quite awhile.) Each moment feels like it could be the last for any of the characters. It’s a slowly constructed film, but at no point does it drag. It’s exactly precise (redundancy intended.)
Get ready to be sick of hearing about this film in the next six months. It’s that good.
| Print article | This entry was posted by This Guy Over Here on September 1, 2009 at 12:22 am, and is filed under 2009, Action, Mystery/Thriller, War. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Director | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Original Screenplay | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Adapted Screenplay | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- Blurays I Would Buy If… | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Actor | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Editing | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Original Score | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here
- 82nd Academy Awards Blogathon: Best Picture | The Best Films of 2000s: This Guy Over Here













about 2 months ago
I am convinced – if a male directed this movie, it would never have won the Oscar. This movie had no right taking the screenplay award, let alone best picture. And what the hell is Jeremy Renner getting nominated for this? This was a decent film with a handful of powerful moments. Nothing more. Over-hyped and the media helped this win the grand prize. Frankly, I was a bit bored during it.
about 2 months ago
Peter – I’m not sure I agree with the gender statement. I think that the fact Katheryn Bigelow directed it is an afterthought – not something that changes the experience of the film. If you went into the film not knowing who directed it, like most of America does, and found out afterwards that it was a woman, I think it says more about our preconceived notions on female directors than it does about the actual film.
about 1 month ago
If anyone else (with the exception of Michael Bay) had directed this film they still would have won.
If any film was over-hyped by the media it was Blind Side.
about 1 month ago
Fitz – I’m not sure I could ever have come up with a more accurate or appropriate summation as you just have. Yes, and yes.